From an email forward: May 31, 2010
Without eliminating corruption and leakages, how can the government expect the rakyat to bear the burden of subsidy cuts?
In the play “Caught in the Middle 4,” Chandran pointedly asks, “And when are we going to stop subsidising the government?”
These simple questions strike at the heart of the current subsidies debate.
The government goes on about shrinking coffers, increasing debt and economic hardship; saying that it is time for the rakyat to tighten their belts and throw away their crutches — to change their lifestyles and have a paradigm shift, as Barisan Nasional (BN) has said before.
This is a lot to ask of Malaysians — the millions who run small food stalls, are low-wage earners, labourers , bus drivers and gardeners or work in local night markets.
The better-off among us will be protected from the worst effects of these policies, but for the rest of Malaysia, food subsidies mean whether a meal comes with meat or just eggs or even skipping a meal; education subsidies are the difference between a poor family’s youngest child attending school and staying at home.
Inevitably, the cuts will affect millions of Malaysians including the poor , average income earners and pensioners and catalyse the crime rate in the country.
In times of crisis, it might be justified to ask the rakyat to bear such increased economic burdens.
But the question is: Are those in power also carrying their share of the burden?
Can they honestly say they’ve done enough to stop the horrendous and immense outflow of public funds due to corruption and inefficiency?
If not, is it morally right of them to be thinking of making the rakyat bear this burden, while so many continue to steal from Malaysia?
Some may think that detractors like me are exaggerating, but I think recent history provides us with ample examples.
Not forgetting the fat contracts handed out to crony toll concessionaires with built-in clauses to ensure they get sufficiently compensated irrespective of whether the company makes a profit or loss.
Ramli and Muthu vs Submarines and PKFZ
After all, is it right to ask Ramli’s family to stop including chicken for dinner, while some people are taking half a BILLION in “commission” for the purchase of submarines that don’t submerge?
Is it right that Muthu’s daughter can no longer go to school after textbook fees have become unbearable for the family, while RM12 billion of our money — money that could have made those textbooks available for free — is lost through the PKFZ scandal?
As an aside, it is sad that MCA has lost the president who did his best to uncover this scandal and bring the perpetrators to justice, only to have him replaced by a president whose “big plan” is to go around begging for more funds from Umno — funds that will likely end up in the hands of “select” contractors anyway.
The simple fact is that not only has the government failed to bring corrupt politicians and officials to book, the government is in fact led by the very worst of these offenders.
Having the same former minister of defence — who was behind said submarine deal and his buddy’s commission — now asking Malaysians to tighten their belts is, I think, a little too much for us to bear.
Such a government lacks any moral authority or credibility to ask the rest of us to make sacrifices, when top officials stay unaffected and continue to live comfortably off the fat they have accumulated at our expense over decades. To even consider doing so is to demonstrate the exact antithesis of what leadership should be.
If and when significant progress is made in fighting corruption and leakages, then we can perhaps discuss the economics of subsidies.
If not, all that cutting subsidies will do is give the current pirates running our government more to loot.
Malaysia = Greece?
It has been disappointing to see Datuk Seri Idris Jala at the forefront of the campaign to cut subsidies. His past reputation has been reduced to one of a common BN spin doctor and hatchet man — sacrificed as a pawn to do BN’s dirty work. I can just imagine their communications “think-tank” believing they struck gold when they came up with the Greek analogy.
I am entirely inclined to agree that we are headed the way of Greece. But what Idris and his boys aren’t telling you, however, is summarised very well in Wikipedia:
“However, the Greek economy also faces significant problems, including rising unemployment levels, inefficient bureaucracy, tax evasion and corruption.
“In 2009, Greece had the EU’s second lowest Index of Economic Freedom (after Poland), ranking 81st in the world. The country suffers from high levels of political and economic corruption and low global competitiveness relative to its EU partners.”
Sound familiar?
In Greece, as in Malaysia, what is tearing the economy apart is not subsidies, but hopeless mismanagement, “piratisation,” and wholesale rape of the economy by the corrupt.
This tirade against subsidies has also not gone unnoticed by corporate watchers.
The hypocrisy bites hard when Malaysians remember bail-outs of Proton, MAS, Konsortium Perkapalan Bhd , Renong , UEM, DRB, Perwaja, YTL’s IPPs, Ting Pek King’s Bakun and most recently, Sime Darby.
And why are we continuing to support industries in which we are not competitive — just because an old man got it into his head a long time ago that it would be “awesome” for the country?
Let’s not even get started on multi-million New York Times ads to feature select “big” personalities.
Leadership by example
Good governance is in no small part about leadership by example.
The rakyat may be able to accept some measure of subsidy reductions — of a government can show truly genuine progress in combating corruption and leakages, as well as maintaining impeccable standards of integrity and austerity among its top leaders.
Failing this — and I think failure is exactly what surrounds our current government — it falls to the rest of us to object to any more measures (added to an already never-ending list) that will burden the rakyat while allowing the fat cats to roam free.
The worst is our leaders had not even realized the state of the economy until recently and being given the stewardship had unfortunately steered the country’s economy towards the cliff and down into the deep blue sea.
This is a wakeup call to all concerned citizens who love this country and want to rid it of rampant bribery, corruption, cronism and power abuse that come g. e. 2013, we must all vote for change as has happened in the Sibu buy election recently despite the deal of "You help me, I help you" by you know who.
The ghost of Altantuya is propelling this message forward.
has to say about Twin Rivers Technology:
